svn commit: r390485 - head/devel/p5-Test-Simple

[Adam Weinberger]

> On 24 Jun, 2015, at 10:13, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 24 Jun, 2015, at 9:36, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote:
>>> On 24 Jun, 2015, at 9:14, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Adam Weinberger <adamw at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> Author: adamw
>>> Date: Wed Jun 24 14:54:11 2015
>>> New Revision: 390485
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/390485
>>> 
>>> Log:
>>>  Update to 1.001014.
>>> 
>>>  Changes: https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/Test-Simple
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> This update would bring conflicts with devel/p5-Test-Tester and devel/p5-Test-use-ok.
>>> That's why I did not update devel/p5-Test-File to 1.42+ (which requires Test::Builder 1.001006+).
>>> IMHO, it would be better to replace all p5-Test-Tester and p5-Test-use-ok along with this update.
>> 
>> Sorry, I'm not following what you mean by "replace all". Do you mean remove the p5-Test-Tester and p5-Test-use-ok ports and repoint those dependencies to p5-Test-Simple?
>> 
>> # Adam
>> 
>> 
>> Yes, I meant to say "replace all p5-Test-Tester and p5-Test-use-ok occurrence with latest p5-Test-Simple".
>> And these dependencies would become conditional as they are in core since lang/perl5.22.
>> For p5-Test-Tester and p5-Test-use-ok, we could mark them DEPRECATED and set EXPIRATION_DATE to end of July.
> 
> I'm thinking it's probably also worth putting an entry into UPDATING to minimize the number of people confused by sudden build failures, no?

Okay I think I've gotten all the dependencies moved over, set DEPRECATED and EXPIRATION_DATE on both the ports, and added an UPDATING entry.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention, sunpoet!

# Adam


-- 
Adam Weinberger
adamw at adamw.org
http://www.adamw.org