svn commit: r379485 - in head: mail/thunderbird/files www/firefox-esr/files www/libxul/files

John Marino freebsd.contact at marino.st
Sat Feb 21 20:00:41 UTC 2015


On 2/21/2015 13:19, Jan Beich wrote:
> John Marino <freebsd.contact at marino.st> writes:
> 
>>> Author: jbeich
>>> Date: Sat Feb 21 08:22:28 2015
>>> New Revision: 379485
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/379485
>>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r379485/
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>   Fix invalid conversions of nullptr to bool to unbreak clang 3.6 build
>>>   
>>>   PR:		197857
>>>   Submitted by:	dim (initial version)
>>>   Obtained from:	https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev/commit/dd19f59
>>>
>>
>> All the mozilla stuff is busted on gcc5 for this reason: firefox,
>> seamonkey, libxul, thunderbird.  I have high hopes this patch fixes it.
>>  Are you planning to patch them all?
> 
> Isn't USES=compiler:c++11-lang supposed to pick Clang over GCC?

Not on DragonFly.

> This commit only backports the fix from Firefox 32, SeaMonkey 2.29.
> 
> If you haven't filed a bug don't expect me to know about the issue.
> My testing is limited due to not having a buildfarm/fast hardware
> while (any) GCC requires more memory/buildtime than Clang + extra
> time spent building the compiler itself. So, just knowing which
> file/which line fails to compile would have saved a lot of time.

GCC 5 isn't even in pre-release yet, but this issue with all of Mozilla
is pretty well documented because Fedora 22 will release with GCC-5 and
all the mozilla stuff failed to build.

I've got my own list of around ~180 ports that failed to build although
some of them were due to not passing flags and not setting the
environment.  I only found out this week about Mozilla and I'm still
working the big package failures (e.g. I just fixed boost-libs which
took out over 800 ports).

I only expected a problem with -esr ports because I have to assume these
errors will be fixed before next year.

Anyway, I was sincere with my thanks.  It was a welcome sight to see
these fixed before I had to do something with them.  BTW, I've already
checked and they now build on gcc-5.

John




More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list