svn commit: r384106 - head/Mk/Uses

[Philip M. Gollucci]

If you say so, I have completely different perspective from ruby@, apache@,
perl@, and to a lesser extent python at .

Like I said I don't  care in the end.  If it works it works.

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:36 PM, John Marino <freebsd.contact at marino.st>
wrote:

> On 4/20/2015 21:03, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> > Could you point lua@ to ports@ ?  The goal really is to have a central
> > place for lua ports (other than ports@).
> >
> > I don't really care one way or the other, I just hate to see large
> > groups of ports sit a ports@ that need coordination / standards.
>
> I disagree with this suggestion.  In that case, lua maintenance will be
> hindered by a phantom team.  People tend to avoid team ports because
> there's always the fear there is some big exp-run brewing (big hidden
> picture).
>
> lua has a much better chance of being maintained as ports@ in this case,
> IMO.  There won't be the uncertainty of the unknown / hand-slap.
>
> John
>



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curb: Your ride is here
4096R/D1EAB94D 2081 E230 3001 6508 8847  1BBF A0A8 DB0F D1EA B94D
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci at p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
Member,                           Apache Software Foundation
Committer,                        FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant,                       P6M7G8 Inc.
Sr. Director IT Operations,       Curb

What doesn't kill us can only make us stronger;
Except it almost kills you.