svn commit: r351936 - in head: . Mk Mk/Uses archivers/libcomprex archivers/libdynamite archivers/liborange archivers/librtfcomp archivers/lzo2 archivers/ucl archivers/unshield audio/gstreamer1-plug...
Gerald Pfeifer
gerald at pfeifer.com
Tue Jul 8 23:53:00 UTC 2014
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> - ${RM} -f ${STAGEDIR}${TARGLIB}/*.la
>> ${RM} -f ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/man/man7/*
>> ${RM} -f ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/bin/rebuild-gcj-db${SUFFIX} \
>> ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/man/man1/rebuild-gcj-db${SUFFIX}.1
> The problem is that you create plist in post-install while USES=libtool
> only removes .la files after staging. I'm thinking of moving the
> patch-lafiles target right before post-stage so you can create plist in
> post-stage, but for now you'll have to keep the RM (together with
> USES=libtool).
I looked into this further and tested various patches. It turns out
the lang/gcc* had some *.la left over which I now removed as well (for
lang/gcc410 today, others in the coming days).
The primary difference I can see if I add USES=libtool on top is that
I get a couple of libraries like the following ones:
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libstdc++.so.6.0.21
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libstdc++.so.6.0.21-gdb.py
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libcilkrts.so.5.0.0
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libssp.so.0.0.0
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libquadmath.so.0.0.0
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgfortran.so.3.0.0
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libobjc.so.4.0.0
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgcj.so.15.0.0
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgij.so.15.0.0
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgcj-tools.so.15.0.0
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libgomp.so.1.0.0
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libitm.so.1.0.0
prefix/gcc410/lib/gcc410/libatomic.so.1.1.0
prefix/gcc410/libexec/gcc410/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd10.0/4.10.0/liblto_plugin.so.0.0.0
So, should I still add USES=libtool to these ports?
Gerald
More information about the svn-ports-head
mailing list