svn commit: r366349 - head/archivers/rpm4

[Dmitry Marakasov]

* John Marino (freebsd.contact at marino.st) wrote:

> >> Does it test with a non-default prefix maybe?  Because these directories
> >> really are in lang/python27/pkg-plist.  It would at least have to be
> >> dirrmtry here, because other ports install files in those directories.
> > 
> > Strange, poudriere doesn't complain on these any more (no, I haven't
> > used non-default prefix). So I've removed them.
> > 
> > And yes, @dirrmtry should've been used here. Regarding directories
> > shared by multiple ports, I still don't have clear understanding:
> > on one hand, if a directory is managed by dependency, it shouldn't
> > appear in the port plist. On the other hand, if a port is installed
> > with non-default prefix, it should manage all dirs it uses on its
> > own. I probably would prefer the latter as it's more flexible and
> > less error prone (what if dependent ports plist change and directory
> > is no longer shared).
> 
> if the directory is provided by a dependency 100% of the cases, then it
> shouldn't be in pkg-plist because it will try-fail 100% of the time.

As I've said, this 100% is unreliable as it may change sometime

> The non-standard prefix isn't an issue because all ports will have the
> same non-standard prefix.  There's no difference.

No, just an individual port may be installed with non-standard prefix
(while dependencies remain in standard one).

-- 
Dmitry Marakasov   .   55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56  9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amdmi3 at amdmi3.ru  ..:  jabber: amdmi3 at jabber.ru    http://www.amdmi3.ru