svn commit: r364739 - in head: . sysutils sysutils/syslog-ng-devel sysutils/syslog-ng-devel/files

[Lars Engels]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:44:59PM +0200, John Marino wrote:
> On 8/12/2014 21:39, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > Author: cy
> > Date: Tue Aug 12 19:39:33 2014
> > New Revision: 364739
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/364739
> > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r364739/
> > 
> > Log:
> >   Reintroduce syslog-ng-devel for 3.6.0alpha2.
> >   
> >   Submitted by:	Peter Czanik <peter.czanik at balabit.com> (syslog-ng upline)
> 
> 
> Do Ports really need alpha quality -devel ports in the collection?
> 
> If it were up to me I'd purge 90% of our -devel ports.  I tried to start
> a conversation about a policy for these with portmgr, but as usual, only
> one person responded.  I'd still like to have that conversation though.
>  This -devel port trend is disturbing.
> 

If it were up to me I'd purge 95% of the ports tree, because I use less
than 5% of it. But hey, there are other people with other needs, so I am
perfectly happy with the size of the tree.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20140813/48ff821f/attachment.sig>