svn commit: r364739 - in head: . sysutils sysutils/syslog-ng-devel sysutils/syslog-ng-devel/files
John Marino
freebsd.contact at marino.st
Tue Aug 12 20:08:26 UTC 2014
On 8/12/2014 21:56, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/12/2014 2:44 PM, John Marino wrote:
>> On 8/12/2014 21:39, Cy Schubert wrote:
>>> Author: cy
>>> Date: Tue Aug 12 19:39:33 2014
>>> New Revision: 364739
>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/364739
>>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r364739/
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> Reintroduce syslog-ng-devel for 3.6.0alpha2.
>>>
>>> Submitted by: Peter Czanik <peter.czanik at balabit.com> (syslog-ng upline)
>>
>>
>> Do Ports really need alpha quality -devel ports in the collection?
>>
>> If it were up to me I'd purge 90% of our -devel ports. I tried to start
>> a conversation about a policy for these with portmgr, but as usual, only
>> one person responded. I'd still like to have that conversation though.
>> This -devel port trend is disturbing.
>>
>> John
>>
>
> Why? Devel ports need testing and there are many users willing to use
> them. Poudriere-devel probably has more users than the main port right
> now, judging from feedback I have received.
As ports directly to improve FreeBSD infrastructure, poudriere-devel and
pkg-devel are included in my 10%. (as in they are ok)
As for why:
1) They become a burden on everyone, even if they have a maintainer.
Sweeping changes have to be applied twice.
2) What if every port had a -devel version? Now we are taking 45k+
ports.
3) -devel versions are poor quality often
4) -devel versions are often neglected and are often older than the
stable version
To me, they are more trouble than they are worth especially when the
ports are reset. I think there should be a pretty high bar for devel
ports, and maintainer need to justify why they want to convert the
FreeBSD community into a testers for third party software (which is the
reason I've heard).
With the exception of FreeBSD functionality, keep the testing out of
ports. It will improve the quality and easy our collective maintenance
burder.
John
More information about the svn-ports-head
mailing list