svn commit: r332606 - in head/lang/nqc: . files

[Bryan Drewery]

On 11/3/2013 1:47 PM, John Marino wrote:
> On 11/3/2013 20:29, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 11:37:03 +0000 (UTC) John Marino wrote:
>>>    * make use of OSVERSION for FreeBSD only
>>
>> Are there any guidelines for this?  Should we start making all
>> OSVERSION uses FreeBSD only?
> 
> By definition, OSVERSION is only valid for FreeBSD, so the correct thing
> to do always is add OPSYS to the condition.
> 
> That said, there's been no official statement to that effect.  I think
> the topic of OSVERSION needs to be explored in general but nothing has
> been decided yet.
> 
> Thanks,
> John
> 

Couldn't you just change OSVERSION in dports' bsd.port.mk to be 999999?
This would be much better than needing to update all ports. I'd say 99%
or more of people are only considering FreeBSD when writing or
maintaining ports.

-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20131103/46b58244/attachment.sig>