svn commit: r319380 - head/math/libtommath
Eitan Adler
eadler at freebsd.org
Thu May 30 18:56:06 UTC 2013
On 30 May 2013 20:38, b.f. <bf1783 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> BROKEN is not used just because a port fails its regression tests but
>> it isn't reserved just for build failures.
>
> Of course it isn't. My point was that even if the test failure
> indicated a "failure of the actual program", it doesn't necessarily
> mean that the port should be marked BROKEN, as you seemed to suggest.
> It depends on the nature of the failure.
Ah, I see.
I was more concerned that regression test was disabled without looking
into the nature of the failure.
The commit log was not clear.
That said, I think we have the answer from miwi@ already so it is a moot point.
--
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
More information about the svn-ports-head
mailing list