svn commit: r317227 - head

[Emanuel Haupt]

Tijl Coosemans <tijl at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 2013-05-03 19:59, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> > Author: ehaupt
> > Date: Fri May  3 17:59:06 2013
> > New Revision: 317227
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/317227
> > 
> > Log:
> >   Add a note about the security/libgcrypt update.
> > 
> > Modified:
> >   head/UPDATING
> > 
> > Modified: head/UPDATING
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- head/UPDATING	Fri May  3 17:42:12 2013	(r317226)
> > +++ head/UPDATING	Fri May  3 17:59:06 2013	(r317227)
> > @@ -5,6 +5,27 @@ they are unavoidable.
> >  You should get into the habit of checking this file for changes
> > each time you update your ports collection, before attempting any
> > port upgrades. 
> > +20130503:
> > +  AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt and any port that depends
> > on it
> > +  AUTHOR: ehaupt at FreeBSD.org
> > +
> > +  The libgcrypt port has been updated to 1.5.2 and all shared
> > libraries
> > +  versions have been bumped. So you need to rebuild all
> > applications that
> > +  depend on libgcrypt. Do something like:
> 
> This shouldn't have happened.
> 
> In the configure.ac for version 1.5.0 it says:
> 
> > # LT Version numbers, remember to change them just *before* a
> > # release. (Interfaces removed:    CURRENT++, AGE=0, REVISION=0)
> > #   (Interfaces added:      CURRENT++, AGE++, REVISION=0)
> > #   (No interfaces changed:                   REVISION++)
> > LIBGCRYPT_LT_CURRENT=18
> > LIBGCRYPT_LT_AGE=7
> > LIBGCRYPT_LT_REVISION=0
> 
> In 1.5.2 it is:
> 
> > # LT Version numbers, remember to change them just *before* a
> > # release. (Interfaces removed:    CURRENT++, AGE=0, REVISION=0)
> > #   (Interfaces added:      CURRENT++, AGE++, REVISION=0)
> > #   (No interfaces changed:                   REVISION++)
> > # NOTE: This is a stable branch, thus you may only bump up REVISION
> > # unless you coordinate with the development branch.
> > #
> > LIBGCRYPT_LT_CURRENT=19
> > LIBGCRYPT_LT_AGE=8
> > LIBGCRYPT_LT_REVISION=1
> 
> The library version should be CURRENT - AGE, i.e. 11 in both cases and
> therefore no version bump.
 
Should we patch configure.ac in the future?