svn commit: r314948 - in head/lang/sdcc: . files

[Tijl Coosemans]

Author: tijl (src committer)
Date: Fri Mar 22 16:54:51 2013
New Revision: 314948
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/314948

Log:
  Fix build with boost 1.52.
  
  Approved by:	crees
  Obtained from:	sdcc revision 8145

Added:
  head/lang/sdcc/files/patch-boost   (contents, props changed)
Modified:
  head/lang/sdcc/Makefile

Modified: head/lang/sdcc/Makefile
==============================================================================
--- head/lang/sdcc/Makefile	Fri Mar 22 16:41:10 2013	(r314947)
+++ head/lang/sdcc/Makefile	Fri Mar 22 16:54:51 2013	(r314948)
@@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
-# New ports collection makefile for:	sdcc
-# Date created:		3 May 2004
-# Whom:			Tijl Coosemans <tijl at ulyssis.org>
-#
 # $FreeBSD$
-#
 
 PORTNAME=	sdcc
 PORTVERSION=	3.2.0
@@ -23,7 +18,6 @@ CONFLICTS_INSTALL=	sdcc-[0-9]*
 GNU_CONFIGURE=	yes
 USE_BZIP2=	yes
 USE_GMAKE=	yes
-USE_GCC=	4.6+
 
 OPTIONS_DEFINE= DEVLIB DOCS HC08 MCS51 PIC UCSIM Z80
 OPTIONS_DEFAULT=${OPTIONS_DEFINE:NDOCS}

Added: head/lang/sdcc/files/patch-boost
==============================================================================
--- /dev/null	00:00:00 1970	(empty, because file is newly added)
+++ head/lang/sdcc/files/patch-boost	Fri Mar 22 16:54:51 2013	(r314948)
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+--- src/SDCCtree_dec.hpp.orig
++++ src/SDCCtree_dec.hpp
+@@ -53,6 +53,14 @@
+ #include <boost/graph/copy.hpp>
+ #include <boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp>
+ 
++struct forget_properties
++{
++  template<class T1, class T2>
++  void operator()(const T1&, const T2&) const
++  {
++  }
++};
++
+ // Thorup algorithm D.
+ // The use of the multimap makes the complexity of this O(|I|log|I|), which could be reduced to O(|I|).
+ template <class l_t>
+@@ -152,7 +160,7 @@
+ {
+   // Should we do this? Or just use G as J? The Thorup paper seems unclear, it speaks of statements that contain jumps to other statements, but does it count as a jump, when they're just subsequent?
+   boost::adjacency_list<boost::vecS, boost::vecS, boost::directedS> J;
+-  boost::copy_graph(G, J);
++  boost::copy_graph(G, J, boost::vertex_copy(forget_properties()).edge_copy(forget_properties()));
+   for (unsigned int i = 0; i < boost::num_vertices(J) - 1; i++)
+     remove_edge(i, i + 1, J);
+ 
+@@ -256,7 +264,7 @@
+ 
+   // Todo: Implement a graph adaptor for boost that allows to treat directed graphs as undirected graphs.
+   boost::adjacency_list<boost::vecS, boost::vecS, boost::undirectedS> G_sym;
+-  boost::copy_graph(G, G_sym);
++  boost::copy_graph(G, G_sym, boost::vertex_copy(forget_properties()).edge_copy(forget_properties()));
+ 
+   std::vector<bool> active(boost::num_vertices(G), true);
+ 
+--- src/SDCCralloc.hpp.orig
++++ src/SDCCralloc.hpp
+@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@
+   for (var_t i = boost::num_vertices(con) - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+     {
+       cfg_sym_t cfg2;
+-      boost::copy_graph(cfg, cfg2);
++      boost::copy_graph(cfg, cfg2, boost::vertex_copy(forget_properties()).edge_copy(forget_properties()));
+       for (int j = boost::num_vertices(cfg) - 1; j >= 0; j--)
+         {
+           if (cfg[j].alive.find(i) == cfg[j].alive.end())
+@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@
+ #endif
+           // Non-connected CFGs shouldn't exist either. Another problem with dead code eliminarion.
+           cfg_sym_t cfg2;
+-          boost::copy_graph(cfg, cfg2);
++          boost::copy_graph(cfg, cfg2, boost::vertex_copy(forget_properties()).edge_copy(forget_properties()));
+           std::vector<boost::graph_traits<cfg_t>::vertices_size_type> component(num_vertices(cfg2));
+           boost::connected_components(cfg2, &component[0]);
+