svn commit: r313475 - in head/net: . ct v6eval v6eval/files

Chris Rees crees at FreeBSD.org
Wed Mar 6 21:31:25 UTC 2013


On 6 March 2013 21:15, Hiroki Sato <hrs at freebsd.org> wrote:
> Chris Rees <crees at FreeBSD.org> wrote
>   in <CADLo839fzn68Tk2E-n4YpuaOtG-82Ni+9UY4cC40A6O0x9s+SQ at mail.gmail.com>:
>
> cr> Unfortunately a bare add has caused the history of the port to be overwritten.
> cr>
> cr> When reviving a port you need to use svn cp from its old revision, so
> cr> that the history is continuous; addport does this for you.
> cr>
> cr> Would you mind if I forced a commit with this message (or you can)?
> cr>
> cr> "The histories of the older net/ct and net/v6eval can be found at r293439"
>
>  Was r293439 the revision when they were removed?  I looked for the
>  revision they removed in head/ but I could not find, so I thought
>  some removed ports before the svn conversion were not included in the
>  repository.
>
>  I should have been more careful, but how can I find it in this case?

They were actually removed in two separate revisions, so I suppose we
should probably mark each individually (r293441 for ct, r293439 for
v6eval).

I put a little bit in the Committer's Guide linking to a little
database I maintain [1,2], but people quite rightly pointed out it's a
pain, so I modified addport to do it automatically (addport also fixes
MOVED).

Easiest way to restore a port is now to get the files from somewhere,
fix and use addport on it :)

Chris

[1] http://people.freebsd.org/~crees/removed_ports/index.xml [Safari
and Chrome don't seem to like the formatting :( ]

[2] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/article.html#Q13.3.1.


More information about the svn-ports-head mailing list