svn commit: r322262 - in head/x11/sterm: . files

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 06:14:26AM +0000, Jason Helfman wrote:
> New Revision: 322262
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/322262
> 
>     - install correct LICENSE, as it differs from standard
> 
> +LICENSE=	MITX
> +LICENSE_NAME=	MIT/X Consortium License
> +LICENSE_FILE=	${WRKSRC}/LICENSE
> +LICENSE_PERMS=	dist-mirror dist-sell pkg-mirror pkg-sell auto-accept

Google tells me that "MIT/X Consortium License" is what is usually
abbreviated as just MIT.  Google does not suggest any common usage of MITX.
Can you elaborate a bit more on MIT vs. MITX here?

I'm asking because, even if maintainer or you insist on installing custom
LICENSE file, why LICENSE=MIT cannot be used alongside with LICENSE_FILE?

> -+	@tic -s -o ${LOCALBASE}/share/misc st.info
> ++	@tic -s -o  ${LOCALBASE}/share/misc st.info

Why was this part committed?  It looks bogus to me.

./danfe