svn commit: r536305 - head/devel/cvs

[Cy Schubert]

In message <c05d7394-5a54-d1f8-b9d2-43228de4d9f9 at FreeBSD.org>, Jochen 
Neumeiste
r writes:
> 
>
> Am 23.05.20 um 17:40 schrieb Cy Schubert:
> > In message <202005231506.04NF6Qoh040961 at repo.freebsd.org>, Jochen
> > Neumeister wr
> > ites:
> >> Author: joneum
> >> Date: Sat May 23 15:06:26 2020
> >> New Revision: 536305
> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/536305
> >>
> >> Log:
> >>    Give Maintainership to submitter
> >>    
> >>    PR:		246678
> >>    Submitted by:	schaiba at gmail.com
> >>    MFH:		2020Q2
> >>    Sponsored by:	Netzkommune GmbH
> >>
> >> Modified:
> >>    head/devel/cvs/Makefile
> >>
> >> Modified: head/devel/cvs/Makefile
> >> ==========================================================================
> ===
> >> =
> >> --- head/devel/cvs/Makefile	Sat May 23 15:02:21 2020	(r53630
> 4)
> >> +++ head/devel/cvs/Makefile	Sat May 23 15:06:26 2020	(r53630
> 5)
> >> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ PORTREVISION?=	6
> >>   CATEGORIES=	devel
> >>   MASTER_SITES=	LOCAL/eadler
> >>   
> >> -MAINTAINER?=	ports at FreeBSD.org
> >> +MAINTAINER?=	schaiba at gmail.com
> >>   COMMENT?=	Version control system
> >>   
> >>   LICENSE=	GPLv2+
> >>
> > I have a problem with people taking maintainership without contributing.
> > How many times has it been when someone requests and receives
> > maintainership, then ignores emails to approve a commit?
> >
> > The first thing to ask in a PR such as this is, what are your plans?
>
>
> This discussion again? :-)
>
> Are there any rules into a Handbook, that define when you can adopt a port?
> Who decides from which post someone is authorized to get a port?

No but maintainer timeout well documented. ;)


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy at FreeBSD.org>   Web:  https://FreeBSD.org
NTP:           <cy at nwtime.org>    Web:  https://nwtime.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.