svn commit: r524241 - head/databases/sqlite3

Baptiste Daroussin bapt at FreeBSD.org
Mon Jan 27 08:34:08 UTC 2020


On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 06:25:04AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 07:19:00AM +0100, Tobias C. Berner wrote:
> > There is talk upstream of no longer supporting system sqlite in the
> > future.
> 
> But that goes against encouraged practices (to avoid bundled libraries),
> what's their rationale for going the wrong way?
> 

The sqlite library is designed to be bundle, many feature are to be activated
at build time (FTS for example, but not only) which may have an impact on many
things.

So sqlite is very peculiar, if upstream is using only common part of sqlite then
it is fine to build unbundled, otherwise it is better to bundle it (for this
one.)

Best regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20200127/61f8c231/attachment.sig>


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list