svn commit: r513679 - head/sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs/files

[Tobias Kortkamp]

On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 11:59:10AM +0400, Gleb Popov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 9:44 AM Tobias Kortkamp <tobik at freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 05:45:40PM +0000, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > > Author: mi
> > > Date: Thu Oct  3 17:45:39 2019
> > > New Revision: 513679
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/513679
> > >
> > > Log:
> > >   Add a patch from upstream, fixing the author's typo in an option's
> > name.
> > >   It only affects users of libsecret, which is off by default -- thus no
> > >   port-revision bump.
> >
> > That's not a valid reason not to bump PORTREVISION.  Please bump
> > it so that users how happen to build it with LIBSECRET=on get your
> > fix automatically.
> >
> 
> I have been told that PORTREVISION should be bumped whenever output package
> changes. It isn't the case here. Or am I mistaken?

We do not have options specific PORTREVISIONs and there are more
package repositories than pkg.FreeBSD.org.  If you have previously
built your packages with LIBSECRET=on, the applied fix will change
the package in a non-trivial way.  However since PORTREVISION was
not bumped Poudriere or other package builders will not rebuild the
package.  Bascially people will have to micromanage/force the rebuild
fusefs-smbnetfs if they want this fix.  fusefs-smbnetfs is hardly
an expensive package to build so saving rebuilds at the cost of
wasting people's time is not worth it and bad UX.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20191006/6054d6d2/attachment.sig>