svn commit: r469188 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg_replace

[Koichiro Iwao]

On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 10:50:12AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> *facepalm*.  This poudriere-driven development is more and more disturbing.
> You didn't attempt to understand the problem, you didn't attempt to fix the
> PLIST_FILES (remove bogus %%ETCDIR%% since this is Makefile), you didn't
> ask for a peer review.  meta@ pessimized the port, provided wrong commit
> log (it tells *nothing* about poudriere failing with a signal 6 in make
> package, it says "pet portlint"), and you've approved it like there's
> nothing wrong with all of this. :-(

Sorry about that. I understand what I should have done and I could do.
Then what should I do next?  Should I turn back to PLIST_FILES?  What should
I do from the next time not to repeat such a folly?

-- 
meta <meta at FreeBSD.org>