svn commit: r460814 - head/www/w3m

Cy Schubert Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com
Sat Feb 3 15:25:57 UTC 2018


In message <20180203144001.GB10426 at FreeBSD.org>, Alexey Dokuchaev 
writes:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 08:33:28AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 02:12:57PM +0000, MANTANI Nobutaka wrote:
> > >   Remove PORTREVISION that should be removed in the previous update.
> > 
> > Well, once it is in, it must stay in, if I understand things correctly.
>
> It was fixed pretty fast, so it's probably OK (typically I'd agree, hence
> I've said "FYI").

I've been in that situation, when an upline vendor sends patches, 
forgets to remove PORTREVSION and I don't catch it. It sucks but it is 
what it is.

Due to timing of mirror updates and people running svnup someone may 
have a port with PORTREVISION and when PORTREVISION is bumped to 1 
again said persons will not receive an update. It's not OK. Either 
revert the change or increase PORTEPOCH.


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy at FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.




More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list