svn commit: r467193 - in head/www/gitlab: . files
Jochen Neumeister
joneum at FreeBSD.org
Fri Apr 13 15:01:45 UTC 2018
On 13.04.2018 15:35, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> Matthias Fechner <idefix at fechner.net> writes:
>> Dear sunpoet,
>> Am 12.04.2018 um 20:33 schrieb Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh:
>>> Log:
>>> Fix Gemfile for rubygem-default_value_for 3.1.0 update
>>> - Bump PORTREVISION for package change
>>> Modified:
>>> head/www/gitlab/Makefile
>>> head/www/gitlab/files/patch-Gemfile
>> I really enjoy your work and it is totally fine for me, if you upgrade a
>> gem that you copy the old one and make sure that gitlab uses the old.
>> (like you did with r467106, thanks a lot for this!)
>> But please do not start to patch the Gemfile!
>> This will break gitlab. Have you tested gitlab with this modification?
>> (for sure not, I reported exactly that version of default_value_for
>> upstream and they rolled back the change as it broke gitlab, they broke
>> 3.0.4 and rolled back the modification with 3.0.5, now you changed
>> gitlab to use the version that for sure will not work!)
>> Please revert this modification and ask me (the maintainer) before you
>> start to modify the port I maintain.
>> Thanks a lot that you understand this.
>> Gruß
>> Matthias
> I relate. Sunpoet, I also appreciate your work, but this type of
> breakage can be frustrating. We need to figure out a solution.
>
+1
Unfortunately sunpoet does not always react when it draws attention to
errors.
Funny: he complained about the mistake myself last year.
It needs a solution to better respect the work of others.
joneum
More information about the svn-ports-all
mailing list