svn commit: r456527 - in head/databases: . postgis20 postgis21 postgis22 postgis23 postgis24

[Mathieu Arnold]

Le 18/12/2017 à 10:15, Rodrigo Osorio a écrit :
> On 12/18/17 02:00, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 01:25:43PM +0100, Rodrigo Osorio wrote:
>>> On 12/17/17 12:41, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 11:25:14AM +0000, Rodrigo Osorio wrote:
>>>>> New Revision: 456527
>>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/456527
>>>>>
>>>>> Log:
>>>>>     Add new port postgis24 for v2.4.x
>>>>>
>>>>> Added:
>>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/
>>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/Makefile   (contents, props changed)
>>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/distinfo   (contents, props changed)
>>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/pkg-descr   (contents, props changed)
>>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/pkg-install   (contents, props changed)
>>>>>     head/databases/postgis24/pkg-plist   (contents, props changed)
>>>> Looks like it should've been repocopied, not added as a new port.
>>>> Can you explain why this wasn't done?
>>> I don't get your question, do you see any issue regarding postgis24
>>> port?
>> I have an issue not with the port per se, but with the way it was
>> carried
>> out (added to the collection).  Please read Section 19.4* of the Ports
>> Committer's Guide, albeit I'm surprised that your mentor did not tell
>> you
>> about it earlier.
> Now I understand...
>
> To clarify my mentor instruct me about the procedure but it was a long
> time ago.
> I don't do this kind of commit so often, and this is probably my mistake.

Now that this is all clarified and you know what to do, please remove
the postgis24 port you added, and add it back using the proper procedure.


-- 
Mathieu Arnold


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20171218/23d23c8d/attachment.sig>