svn commit: r422981 - in head/dns: bind9-devel bind910 bind911 bind99

[John Marino]

On 10/4/2016 09:01, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 04/10/2016 à 15:45, John Marino a écrit :
>> On 9/30/2016 07:44, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>> Author: mat
>>> Date: Fri Sep 30 12:44:27 2016
>>> New Revision: 422981
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/422981
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>   So, on 9, it is failing to build it with jobs.
>>>
>>>   It builds .a before all the .o that are supposed to go in the .a are
>>>   built.  Imagine what happens after that...
>>>
>>>   Reported by:    Craig Leres
>>>   Sponsored by:    Absolight
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>   head/dns/bind9-devel/Makefile   (contents, props changed)
>>>   head/dns/bind910/Makefile   (contents, props changed)
>>>   head/dns/bind911/Makefile   (contents, props changed)
>>>   head/dns/bind99/Makefile   (contents, props changed)
>>>
>>> Modified: head/dns/bind9-devel/Makefile
>>> ==============================================================================
>>>
>>> --- head/dns/bind9-devel/Makefile    Fri Sep 30 11:40:44 2016
>>> (r422980)
>>> +++ head/dns/bind9-devel/Makefile    Fri Sep 30 12:44:27 2016
>>> (r422981)
>>> @@ -238,6 +238,10 @@ PORTDOCS=    *
>>>
>>>  .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
>>>
>>> +.if ${OSVERSION} <= 1000000
>>> +MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=    yes
>>> +.endif
>>> +
>>>  .if ( ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGOST} || ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGOST_ASN1} ) &&
>>> ${SSL_DEFAULT} == base
>>>  BROKEN=    OpenSSL from the base system does not support GOST, add \
>>>      DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl to your /etc/make.conf and rebuild
>>> everything \
>>>
>>> Modified: head/dns/bind910/Makefile
>>> ==============================================================================
>>>
>>> --- head/dns/bind910/Makefile    Fri Sep 30 11:40:44 2016    (r422980)
>>> +++ head/dns/bind910/Makefile    Fri Sep 30 12:44:27 2016    (r422981)
>>> @@ -225,6 +225,10 @@ PORTDOCS=    *
>>>
>>>  .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
>>>
>>> +.if ${OSVERSION} <= 1000000
>>> +MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=    yes
>>> +.endif
>>> +
>>>  .if ( ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGOST} || ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGOST_ASN1} ) &&
>>> ${SSL_DEFAULT} == base
>>>  BROKEN=    OpenSSL from the base system does not support GOST, add \
>>>      DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl to your /etc/make.conf and rebuild
>>> everything \
>>>
>>> Modified: head/dns/bind911/Makefile
>>> ==============================================================================
>>>
>>> --- head/dns/bind911/Makefile    Fri Sep 30 11:40:44 2016    (r422980)
>>> +++ head/dns/bind911/Makefile    Fri Sep 30 12:44:27 2016    (r422981)
>>> @@ -236,6 +236,10 @@ PORTDOCS=    *
>>>
>>>  .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
>>>
>>> +.if ${OSVERSION} <= 1000000
>>> +MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=    yes
>>> +.endif
>>> +
>>>  .if ( ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGOST} || ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGOST_ASN1} ) &&
>>> ${SSL_DEFAULT} == base
>>>  BROKEN=    OpenSSL from the base system does not support GOST, add \
>>>      DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl to your /etc/make.conf and rebuild
>>> everything \
>>>
>>> Modified: head/dns/bind99/Makefile
>>> ==============================================================================
>>>
>>> --- head/dns/bind99/Makefile    Fri Sep 30 11:40:44 2016    (r422980)
>>> +++ head/dns/bind99/Makefile    Fri Sep 30 12:44:27 2016    (r422981)
>>> @@ -190,6 +190,10 @@ PORTDOCS=    *
>>>
>>>  .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
>>>
>>> +.if ${OSVERSION} <= 1000000
>>> +MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=    yes
>>> +.endif
>>> +
>>>  .if ( ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGOST} ) && ${SSL_DEFAULT} == base
>>>  BROKEN=    OpenSSL from the base system does not support GOST, add \
>>>      DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl to your /etc/make.conf and rebuild
>>> everything \
>>>
>>
>> It's not specific to FreeBSD 9:
>> --- rndc-confgen ---
>> /usr/libexec/binutils225/elf/ld.gold: error: unix/os.o: file is empty
>> keygen.o:keygen.c:function write_key_file: error: undefined reference
>> to 'set_user'
>>
>> Would you consider returning this to unconditional unsafe as it was
>> before?
>
> What FreeBSD version is this ? I have tried quite a few times on 10/11
> before declaring that they were safe, whereas on 9 it was always failing.

It's not, it's DragonFly.
The opsys isn't relevant. It just means the tests you did weren't 
sufficient to determine jobs safety, which is a pregnancy test (it 
either is or is not; this obviously isn't)

We build under a very heavy load which flushes out marginally unsafe ports.

John

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus