svn commit: r384947 - in head/lang: . gcc5-devel

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> You did forget to set a specific suffix, which mean we now have 2 
> packages named gcc5 which is a problem for pkg and poudriere, a 
> package name should remain unique.
  
I am starting to wonder, wouldn't it be better to have PORTNAME
reflect the (directory) name of the port instead of being more
abstract and general?
  
Even since I changed the lang/gcc* ports to have a PORTNAME of
just gcc as opposed to gcc47, gcc48, and so forth, things feel
like they have become more fragile (this being one example,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 another).
 
Gerald