svn commit: r393282 - head/lang/chicken
Jason Unovitch
jason.unovitch at gmail.com
Sun Aug 2 14:17:40 UTC 2015
On 07/31/2015 02:50, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:18:49AM +0000, Jason Unovitch wrote:
>> New Revision: 393282
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/393282
>>
>> Log:
>> Security update to Chicken 4.10.0 RC4
>> [...]
>>
>> PORTNAME= chicken
>> -PORTVERSION= 4.10.0.r1
>> +PORTVERSION= 4.10.0.r4
>> PORTEPOCH= 1
>> CATEGORIES= lang scheme
>> -MASTER_SITES= http://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2015/06/07/
>> -DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION:.r1=rc1}
>> +MASTER_SITES= http://code.call-cc.org/dev-snapshots/2015/07/24/
>> +DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION:.r4=rc4}
>
> Yuck. Any reason not to use DISTVERSION rather than PORTVERSION + dances?
>
> ./danfe
>
No, there's no reason to not use DISTVERSION. I made a mention to it to
the maintainer in https://bugs.FreeBSD.org/200980 and I'll keep the
feedback in mind for next time myself as well. In the near term when
4.10.0 is finally released we can snip off the .r4 and remove the
DISTNAME dance.
Jason
More information about the svn-ports-all
mailing list