svn commit: r384106 - head/Mk/Uses

[John Marino]

On 4/20/2015 21:03, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Could you point lua@ to ports@ ?  The goal really is to have a central
> place for lua ports (other than ports@).
> 
> I don't really care one way or the other, I just hate to see large
> groups of ports sit a ports@ that need coordination / standards.

I disagree with this suggestion.  In that case, lua maintenance will be
hindered by a phantom team.  People tend to avoid team ports because
there's always the fear there is some big exp-run brewing (big hidden
picture).

lua has a much better chance of being maintained as ports@ in this case,
IMO.  There won't be the uncertainty of the unknown / hand-slap.

John