svn commit: r372684 - head/www/rejik

[John Marino]

On 11/17/2014 21:31, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> Author: antoine
> Date: Mon Nov 17 20:31:56 2014
> New Revision: 372684
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/372684
> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r372684/
> 
> Log:
>   Mark BROKEN (please don't resurect broken ports...)
> 


I believe the port was a new effort -- it wasn't just a revival.

Is failure to stage as non-root considered "broken" ?  Wouldn't there be
a lot of broken ports with that criteria?

John