svn commit: r349288 - head/archivers/ocaml-bz2
Antoine Brodin
antoine at FreeBSD.org
Wed Mar 26 22:26:24 UTC 2014
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:17 PM, John Marino <freebsd.contact at marino.st> wrote:
> On 3/26/2014 21:18, Antoine Brodin wrote:
>> Author: antoine
>> Date: Wed Mar 26 20:18:38 2014
>> New Revision: 349288
>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/349288
>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r349288/
>>
>> Log:
>> Stage support
>>
>> Modified:
>> head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile
>>
>> Modified: head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile Wed Mar 26 20:09:29 2014 (r349287)
>> +++ head/archivers/ocaml-bz2/Makefile Wed Mar 26 20:18:38 2014 (r349288)
>> @@ -12,10 +12,9 @@ DISTNAME= caml${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}
>> MAINTAINER= jaapb at kerguelen.org
>> COMMENT= OCaml library to manipulate bz2 files
>>
>> +DESTDIRNAME= DONTUSEIT
>> GNU_CONFIGURE= yes
>> USES= gmake
>> -NO_STAGE= yes
>> -
>
> You left USE_OCAML_LDCONFIG= yes.
> Won't this create an ldconf file that will get added to plist and will
> conflict potentially with the real ldconf?
>
> USE_OCAML_WASH is also set. Is this knob actually desireable? Why is
> it needed if it's competing with pkg to remove files?
>
> I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just trying to learn this.
Hi,
I modifed bsd.ocaml.mk so now USE_OCAML_LDCONFIG doesn't violate
stagedir anymore.
For USE_OCAML_WASH, I have doubts on its usefulness, maybe it should
be garbage collected in all the tree.
Cheers,
Antoine
More information about the svn-ports-all
mailing list