svn commit: r348113 - head/graphics/libEGL

[Antoine Brodin]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Niclas Zeising <zeising at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 2014-03-14 10:10, Antoine Brodin wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Niclas Zeising <zeising at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> As far as I know, this was not a security related issue.  It was a bug
>>> in a ports makefile in a piece of xorg that is not used/installed by
>>> default.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 28 ports depend on it (via x11/kde4-workspace),  this was enough to
>> trigger an investigation from me (with my portmgr hat)
>
> I did not know that it had such many dependent ports already, since it
> was added less than 6 months ago and is only used with WITH_NEW_XORG,
> which hasn't been the default in 11 for so long, and isn't the default
> anywhere else.
>
> With that said, I did not know that you were part of portmgr when you
> made the commit, and I had just seen your email to x11@, so I did not
> have very much time to react before this was committed.  I apologize if
> I was a bit harsh in my reply.
>
> Lastly, if you can give us a little more time before acting the next
> time, or at least a reminder and/or a poke after the commit that would
> be very nice.  It's easy to loose or miss mail on any public mailing
> list.  It would also have been nice if you had added with hat: portmgr
> or something like that to the commit message.

Ok

> Also, a question for portmgr as a whole.  Is there a list of members
> somewhere?  I can only find an outdated wiki article
> (https://wiki.freebsd.org/portmgr), and that says at the top that it's
> under construction and refers to another page instead.

Both https://wiki.freebsd.org/portmgr and
http://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/ are up to date, for the portmgr
members at least.

Cheers,

Antoine