svn commit: r347936 - in head: . japanese japanese/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin japanese/spamassassin mail mail/claws-mail-spamassassin mail/evolution mail/exim mail/isbg mail/mailscanner mail/mimedefang m...

[Mathieu Arnold]

+--On 12 mars 2014 09:15:13 -0400 Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote:
| 
| 
| On March 12, 2014 9:06:43 AM EDT, Mathieu Arnold <mat at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
|> +--On 12 mars 2014 07:46:05 -0500 Bryan Drewery <bdrewery at FreeBSD.org>
|> wrote:
|>| On 3/11/2014 9:56 PM, Andrej Zverev wrote:
|>|> I think since p5-Mail-SA has a long history in ports tree, you
|>|> (can/need/good idea) also send short annonce of such changes to
|>|> port-announce@ and ports@ maillists.
|>| 
|>| No, MOVED is sufficient. We never send ports@ or ports-announce@ for
|>| renamed origins. Even UPDATING is not conventional in this case.
|> 
|> MOVED is not sufficient, people using binary packages only will have to
|> guess what they should do when pkg upgrade tells them they have a
|> conflict.
| 
| Ahh I see what you mean.
| 
| Would
|     pkg set -o mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin:mail/spamassassin
| solve the problem for binary pkg users?

Yes, it does fix the problem, but where do you want to put it ?
They don't have /usr/ports, remember ;-)

-- 
Mathieu Arnold