svn commit: r344402 - head/math/primegen

[Alexey Dokuchaev]

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 11:50:15AM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
> But in the end it is still the maintainer where have to take care of it,
> or at least that person where find a problem [...]

It is hard to imagine who would want to read the logs.  Maybe someone will
want to study how installation/deployment techniques had been changing over
the years in open source, who knows?  Our build logs for some 25K+ ports
can give plenty of interesting data bits.  And making them more uniform and
clear, once I think about it, can help not just debugging. :)

> In the end nobody care about the output as long everything build/package
> is fine.

Package users won't see any of them anyway, of course.  I'm mainly concerned
with traditional ports usage (that is, "cd /usr/ports/cat/foo && make install
clean") which I still do a lot.  It is nice to see what is being installed,
even if everything is fine: then I don't have to read pkg-plist to see "now,
where I do start with this thing?" for example.  Doesn't happen often, yes,
but then again: we're not actually winning anything by muting them.

./danfe