svn commit: r344316 - in head/net-mgmt: . p5-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk p5-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk/files
Mathieu Arnold
mat at FreeBSD.org
Tue Mar 4 12:24:40 UTC 2014
+--On 4 mars 2014 11:27:10 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
| On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:04:39AM +0400, Andrej Zverev wrote:
|> > Submitted by: Andrew Thompson <thompsa at freebsd.org>
|> > +MAINTAINER= perl at FreeBSD.org
|>
|> I know this is old rule, but we don't like such practice (and i think
|> we still) when maintainer != submitter for a new port.
|
| I recall the rule was about that newly added ports should not be
| maintained by ports at . Meta-entities like x11@, perl@, python@, etc. make
| sense, and I don't see a problem here (if a port in question is ineeded
| of such a broad interest and/or importance).
I do, perl@ is a handful of committers, on the top of my head, az, crees,
culot, sunpoet and myself, those are allowed to set the maintainer to perl at .
For the other, the thing is clear, perl@ is not a garbage maintainer for
things people would like added but don't want to maintain after that. We
already have ports@ for that.
There is a policy for perl@ to handle Perl related PR, but only the PR, and
because committers there may have
When we got perl@ created way back when, the idea was to have a team for
important Perl stuff, not for maintaining the whole of CPAN.
--
Mathieu Arnold
More information about the svn-ports-all
mailing list