svn commit: r366349 - head/archivers/rpm4

[Dmitry Marakasov]

* Tijl Coosemans (tijl at FreeBSD.org) wrote:

> >>> Strange, poudriere doesn't complain on these any more (no, I haven't
> >>> used non-default prefix). So I've removed them.
> >>> 
> >>> And yes, @dirrmtry should've been used here. Regarding directories
> >>> shared by multiple ports, I still don't have clear understanding:
> >>> on one hand, if a directory is managed by dependency, it shouldn't
> >>> appear in the port plist. On the other hand, if a port is installed
> >>> with non-default prefix, it should manage all dirs it uses on its
> >>> own. I probably would prefer the latter as it's more flexible and
> >>> less error prone (what if dependent ports plist change and directory
> >>> is no longer shared).
> >> 
> >> if the directory is provided by a dependency 100% of the cases, then it
> >> shouldn't be in pkg-plist because it will try-fail 100% of the time.
> > 
> > As I've said, this 100% is unreliable as it may change sometime
> > 
> >> The non-standard prefix isn't an issue because all ports will have the
> >> same non-standard prefix.  There's no difference.
> > 
> > No, just an individual port may be installed with non-standard prefix
> > (while dependencies remain in standard one).
> 
> I think pkg will handle directories automatically once pkg_install has
> been removed.  Only empty directories and directories with special
> permissions will have to be listed in pkg-plist then.

That would be great.

-- 
Dmitry Marakasov   .   55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56  9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amdmi3 at amdmi3.ru  ..:  jabber: amdmi3 at jabber.ru    http://www.amdmi3.ru