svn commit: r315629 - head/lang/pypy

[David Naylor]

On Sunday, 31 March 2013 17:04:59 Martin Wilke wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2013, at 3:40 PM, David Naylor <naylor.b.david at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Also, I think it would be more appropriate to mark broken *only* for the
> > pointyhat, refer r294051.

I've checked GMail and I only see one email, sent 30 March, titled "Fwd: 
pypy-2.0.b1 failed on amd64 8" however that didn't make it into KMail (the 
newer one), which concerns me as KMail may be deleting other emails :'(

Apologies for the inconvenience around these emails.  

> How many times you want me to forward the email to you? I did the last  few
> days at least once the day a forward.

If you don't mind forwarding another one, please do.  I would like to check 
why I am not receiving them.  
 
> Fist one I have sent to you on the 27th
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> > From: Portbuild user <portbuild at FreeBSD.org>
> > Subject: pypy-2.0.b1 failed on amd64 8
> > Date: March 27, 2013 11:07:02 AM GMT+08:00
> > To: miwi at freebsd.org

GMail and KMail have no record of this email.  Very strange.  
 
> latest yesterday
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> > From: Portbuild user <portbuild at FreeBSD.org>
> > Subject: pypy-2.0.b1 failed on i386 8
> > Date: March 30, 2013 9:15:02 PM GMT+08:00
> > To: miwi at freebsd.org

Yes, this is the email I got, but KMail ate it.  

> To answer your question pointyhat ends up in a never ending run process
> whish i have to kill manual. Considering you did not respond I have it mark
> broken.

There is a risk that a system with insufficient (free) RAM could end up 
swapping forever.  I've included (non-terminal) checks for this case however 
the build logs indicate there was enough (physical) RAM.  

Could you please try again, when no other processes are using the RAM and give 
it at least 4 hours (if the CPU is anything less than a Core 2 give it more 
time please).  

I plan to provide packages for all supported versions and x86(_64).  This, 
however, will take me a few days to setup, if you are interested?  

Apologies again for this issue and the lost emails.  Thanks for your effort, 
not only this with port, but with fixing up the Ports Collection :-)

Regards
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20130331/0b9df9be/attachment.sig>