svn commit: r313614 - head

[Ruslan Makhmatkhanov]

Bryan Drewery wrote on 08.03.2013 16:25:
> Probably.
>
> Portmaster can only handle 1 "-o" at a time. It re-executes itself in an
> ugly hack to replace the package. So it simply just removes the old and
> installs the new.
>
> Portupgrade and pkg(8) act on jobs/transactions of a set of packages to
> upgrade. It does seem reasonable that if the origin AND pkgname have
> changed then a downgrade should not have to be forced. It's just more
> complexity to put into the transaction calculation since (for both) it
> is now mostly a "remove all versions older than the current".
>
> I actually think I may have fixed this case in portupgrade already, but
> am not sure.
>
> For pkg(8) I've entered this at https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues/464

Thank you for an explanation and for a bug report to yourself :).

-- 
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.