svn commit: r310589 - head/security/p5-SAVI-Perl

Frederic Culot culot at FreeBSD.org
Fri Jan 18 09:57:31 UTC 2013


Hi Philippe,

> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Frederic Culot wrote:
> 
> > Author: culot
> > Date: Fri Jan 18 08:18:23 2013
> > New Revision: 310589
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/310589
> > 
> > Log:
> >   - Assign back to the pool
> >   
> >   PR:		ports/175384
> >   Submitted by:	Gary Hayers <gary at hayers.org> (maintainer)
> > 
> > Modified:
> >   head/security/p5-SAVI-Perl/Makefile
> > 
> > Modified: head/security/p5-SAVI-Perl/Makefile
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- head/security/p5-SAVI-Perl/Makefile	Fri Jan 18 08:04:07 2013	(r310588)
> > +++ head/security/p5-SAVI-Perl/Makefile	Fri Jan 18 08:18:23 2013	(r310589)
> > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ MASTER_SITES=	http://www.csupomona.edu/~
> >  MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=	security
> >  PKGNAMEPREFIX=	p5-
> >  
> > -MAINTAINER=	Gary at Hayers.org
> > +MAINTAINER=	ports at FreeBSD.org
> >  COMMENT=	Perl5 module interface to Sophos AntiVirus
> >  
> >  MAN3=		SAVI.3
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Why not perl at FreeBSD.org ?

I could have reassigned it to perl@ but I did not mainly because perl@
already has a huge amount of ports to maintain so it lowers the workload
for them and it gives the opportunity for non-committers to take
maintainership and practice with relatively easy-to-maintain ports.

Indeed, I recently committed a bunch of updates on perl ports based on
PRs sent by someone willing to maintain them and I believe it could lead
to interesting contributions from outsiders.

Moreover this is the policy that was applied so far by portmgr@ when
reassigning perl ports to the heap (see for instance r309602) so I
followed their example.

Hope this clarifies my choice!

> Regards,

Cheers,
Frederic


More information about the svn-ports-all mailing list