svn commit: r310589 - head/security/p5-SAVI-Perl
Frederic Culot
culot at FreeBSD.org
Fri Jan 18 09:57:31 UTC 2013
Hi Philippe,
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Frederic Culot wrote:
>
> > Author: culot
> > Date: Fri Jan 18 08:18:23 2013
> > New Revision: 310589
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/310589
> >
> > Log:
> > - Assign back to the pool
> >
> > PR: ports/175384
> > Submitted by: Gary Hayers <gary at hayers.org> (maintainer)
> >
> > Modified:
> > head/security/p5-SAVI-Perl/Makefile
> >
> > Modified: head/security/p5-SAVI-Perl/Makefile
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- head/security/p5-SAVI-Perl/Makefile Fri Jan 18 08:04:07 2013 (r310588)
> > +++ head/security/p5-SAVI-Perl/Makefile Fri Jan 18 08:18:23 2013 (r310589)
> > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ MASTER_SITES= http://www.csupomona.edu/~
> > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= security
> > PKGNAMEPREFIX= p5-
> >
> > -MAINTAINER= Gary at Hayers.org
> > +MAINTAINER= ports at FreeBSD.org
> > COMMENT= Perl5 module interface to Sophos AntiVirus
> >
> > MAN3= SAVI.3
>
> Hello,
>
> Why not perl at FreeBSD.org ?
I could have reassigned it to perl@ but I did not mainly because perl@
already has a huge amount of ports to maintain so it lowers the workload
for them and it gives the opportunity for non-committers to take
maintainership and practice with relatively easy-to-maintain ports.
Indeed, I recently committed a bunch of updates on perl ports based on
PRs sent by someone willing to maintain them and I believe it could lead
to interesting contributions from outsiders.
Moreover this is the policy that was applied so far by portmgr@ when
reassigning perl ports to the heap (see for instance r309602) so I
followed their example.
Hope this clarifies my choice!
> Regards,
Cheers,
Frederic
More information about the svn-ports-all
mailing list