svn commit: r309910 - head/textproc/docproj
Glen Barber
gjb at FreeBSD.org
Fri Jan 4 01:52:41 UTC 2013
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:30:13AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> FYI, setting YES by default for release package build, and null and
> display a warning in "make install" are the intentional behavior
> because people who blindly install textproc/docproj port tend to
> complain about "PDF version does not build" or "dependency is too
> large". This is why simply "make install" does not work. The reason
> why it is not "no by default" is that it causes inconsistency between
> pkg_add and make install (actually all of docproj* packages have
> jadetex dependency). One has to choose either, anyway. $JADETEX
> knob is a hack added back in the era when there was no OPTIONS, so
> converting it to OPTIONS would be more user-friendly. However,
> setting the default value is still a separate topic. "no" is harmful
> in terms of inconsistency with the pre-built package, and people will
> complain even if it is "yes" by default.
>
> For this reason, we have textproc/docproj-jadetex,
> textproc/docproj-nojadetex, and textproc/docproj with no default
> WITH_JADETEX. These are redundant and a bit messy due to historical
> reasons and they can be reconstructed into the two in a cleaner way,
> but if we want to change them, it should be done in whole.
>
Yes, this (in entirety) was an afterthought.
So, how about this? We make textproc/docproj the default with
WITH_JADETEX enabled, and make textproc/docproj-nojadetex a slave port
that sets WITHOUT_JADETEX post-conversion to optionsng? I think this
solves both user expectations with undefined WITH_JADETEX, and keeps the
-nojadetex option still available. What do you think?
BTW, I see that doceng@ is not maintainer for the slave ports for
textproc/docproj. Can we change this so this is all under our control?
Glen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/attachments/20130103/ab5d796b/attachment.sig>
More information about the svn-ports-all
mailing list