svn commit: r40000 - projects/pkgng/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports

[John Baldwin]

On Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:13:49 pm Glen Barber wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > Isn't the actual application just "pkg"?  It's unclear to what extent we 
> > really need to be talking about pkgng using the string "pkgng".
> > 
> 
> The name of the application is pkgng.  The name of the command is pkg.

This is not a very future proof name.  Do we get pkgngng next, or will it be 
pkgds9?  I think pkgng is fine for a WIP name, but once it moves to production 
status it should really just be called 'pkg'.

-- 
John Baldwin