svn commit: r53618 - in head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook: bsdinstall config eresources kernelconfig
Ed Maste
emaste at freebsd.org
Tue Nov 26 14:57:26 UTC 2019
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 13:12, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> Author: emaste (src committer)
> Date: Wed Nov 20 18:12:25 2019
> New Revision: 53618
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/53618
>
> Log:
> excise ia64 from the handbook
>
> ia64 was last supported in 10.4. No currently supported version of
> FreeBSD supports ia64.
I really wanted to get rid of the obsolete references to ia64 as a
first step, but going through this also identified several places
where we missed adding new architectures; I'll comment on them (and
other notes) below.
> Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/bsdinstall/chapter.xml
> ==============================================================================
At least arm64 should be added to the Minimum Hardware Requirements
section, as arm64 servers are available and installable the same way
as amd64 (e.g. UEFI boot from a USB stick or cdrom image and run
bsdinstall). The powerpc description in this section needs updating
too.
Later on we need to add a booting on arm64 section to go with the
existing Booting on i386 and amd64 etc. (also those fail to mention
UEFI so more updating needed).
> @@ -2710,8 +2698,8 @@ Starting sshd.</screen>
> <para>If the system hangs while probing hardware during boot, or
> it behaves strangely during install, <acronym>ACPI</acronym> may
> be the culprit. &os; makes extensive use of the system
> - <acronym>ACPI</acronym> service on the &arch.i386;,
> - &arch.amd64;, and ia64 platforms to aid in system configuration
> + <acronym>ACPI</acronym> service on the &arch.i386; and
> + &arch.amd64; platforms to aid in system configuration
Need to add arm64 to the list of ACPI-using platforms. We should
probably remove advice about disabling ACPI.
> Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/config/chapter.xml
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/config/chapter.xml Wed Nov 20 17:43:36 2019 (r53617)
> +++ head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/config/chapter.xml Wed Nov 20 18:12:25 2019 (r53618)
> @@ -3005,7 +3005,7 @@ kern.maxvnodes: 100000</screen>
> </indexterm>
>
> <para><acronym>ACPI</acronym> is present in all modern computers
> - that conform to the ia32 (x86), ia64 (Itanium), and amd64
> + that conform to the ia32 (x86) and amd64
More ACPI mentions
> Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources/chapter.xml
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources/chapter.xml Wed Nov 20 17:43:36 2019 (r53617)
> +++ head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources/chapter.xml Wed Nov 20 18:12:25 2019 (r53618)
> @@ -411,12 +411,6 @@
> </row>
>
> <row>
> - <entry>&a.ia64.name;</entry>
> - <entry>Porting &os; to &intel;'s upcoming IA64
> - systems</entry>
> - </row>
It's worth keeping the mailing list archive for historical reasons I
suppose, but it doesn't need to be listed here and doesn't need to
accept new mail. I'll follow up with postmaster.
> Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.xml
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.xml Wed Nov 20 17:43:36 2019 (r53617)
> +++ head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.xml Wed Nov 20 18:12:25 2019 (r53618)
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ ath_hal(4) - Atheros Hardware Access Lay
> <filename>/usr/src/sys</filename>. This directory contains a
> number of subdirectories, including those which represent the
> following supported architectures: <filename>amd64</filename>,
> - <filename>i386</filename>, <filename>ia64</filename>,
> + <filename>i386</filename>,
> <filename>powerpc</filename>, and
> <filename>sparc64</filename>.
arm, arm64, mips missing in this list.
> that may run older applications. Platforms that gained support
> - after &os; 4.X, such as ia64 and &sparc64;, do not require
> + after &os; 4.X, such as &sparc64;, do not require
> this option.</para>
Since it seems sparc64 will be removed in the near future we should
choose a different "after 4.x" architecture.
More information about the svn-doc-head
mailing list