svn commit: r40297 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq

[Eitan Adler]

Author: eadler
Date: Fri Dec  7 13:00:58 2012
New Revision: 40297
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/40297

Log:
  Rewrap minimal-sh
  
  Translators may ignore
  
  PR:		174029
  Submitted by:	Derek Wood <ddwood at highdensity.org>
  Approved by:	bcr (mentor)

Modified:
  head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.xml

Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.xml
==============================================================================
--- head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.xml	Fri Dec  7 13:00:56 2012	(r40296)
+++ head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.xml	Fri Dec  7 13:00:58 2012	(r40297)
@@ -3980,33 +3980,34 @@ kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC -> i82
 
       <qandaentry>
 	<question id="minimal-sh">
-	  <para>Why is <command>/bin/sh</command> so minimal?  Why does
-	    &os; not use <command>bash</command> or another
+	  <para>Why is <command>/bin/sh</command> so minimal?  Why
+	    does &os; not use <command>bash</command> or another
 	    shell?</para>
 	</question>
 
 	<answer>
-	  <para>Many people need to write
-	    shell scripts which will be portable across many systems.
-	    That is why &posix; specifies the shell and utility commands
-	    in great detail.  Most scripts are written in Bourne shell (&man.sh.1;),
-	    and because several important programming interfaces
-	    (&man.make.1;, &man.system.3;, &man.popen.3;, and analogues
-	    in higher-level scripting languages like Perl and Tcl) are
-	    specified to use the Bourne shell to interpret commands.
-	    Because the Bourne shell is so often and widely used, it is
-	    important for it to be quick to start, be deterministic in
-	    its behavior, and have a small memory footprint.</para>
+	  <para>Many people need to write shell scripts which will be
+	    portable across many systems.  That is why &posix;
+	    specifies the shell and utility commands in great detail.
+	    Most scripts are written in Bourne shell (&man.sh.1;), and
+	    because several important programming interfaces
+	    (&man.make.1;, &man.system.3;, &man.popen.3;, and
+	    analogues in higher-level scripting languages like Perl
+	    and Tcl) are specified to use the Bourne shell to
+	    interpret commands.  Because the Bourne shell is so often
+	    and widely used, it is important for it to be quick to
+	    start, be deterministic in its behavior, and have a small
+	    memory footprint.</para>
 
 	  <para>The existing implementation is our best effort at
 	    meeting as many of these requirements simultaneously as we
-	    can.  In order to keep <command>/bin/sh</command> small, we
-	    have not provided many of the convenience features that
+	    can.  In order to keep <command>/bin/sh</command> small,
+	    we have not provided many of the convenience features that
 	    other shells have.  That is why the Ports Collection
 	    includes more featureful shells like
 	    <command>bash</command>, <command>scsh</command>,
-	    &man.tcsh.1;, and <command>zsh</command>.  (You
-	    can compare for yourself the memory utilization of all these
+	    &man.tcsh.1;, and <command>zsh</command>.  (You can
+	    compare for yourself the memory utilization of all these
 	    shells by looking at the <quote>VSZ</quote> and
 	    <quote>RSS</quote> columns in a <command>ps
 	    <option>-u</option></command> listing.)</para>