secure deletion

[Ilmar S. Habibulin]

On 21 May 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:

> Because a mount option can be changed at runtime, whereas a kernel
> option cannot. A mount option would allow you to enable the security
> feature on file systems which need it but not on file systems which do
> not need it, whereas a kernel option would enable it unconditionally
> on all file systems.
And what about it? I just don't understand why this option must be
fs-specific. If file have no flag, it would be deleted in ordinary way. 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at cyrus.watson.org
with "unsubscribe posix1e" in the body of the message