PERFORCE change 187861 for review

[Edward Tomasz Napierala]

http://p4web.freebsd.org/@@187861?ac=10

Change 187861 by trasz at trasz_victim on 2011/01/16 14:50:56

	Update TODO.

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/soc2009/trasz_limits/TODO#39 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/soc2009/trasz_limits/TODO#39 (text+ko) ====

@@ -32,8 +32,6 @@
    level containers could overflow), and atomic(9) doesn't support 64 bit values
    on 32 bit platforms.
 
- - Rethink HRL locking.
-
  - Consider replacing proc pointer with thread pointer in rusage_add(9) et al.
    In most cases caller uses 'td->td_proc' anyway, and passing thread would
    allow the HRL code to send a signal to the offending thread instead of the
@@ -102,7 +100,7 @@
 
 HRL-specific issues:
 
- - Reconsider setrlimit(2) handling.
+ - Reconsider bringing back setrlimit(2) handling.
 
  - Reconsider bringing back per-group limits.
 
@@ -112,7 +110,3 @@
    if one adds rule with 'sig*' action, the signal will be sent to the parent
    instead of the child.
 
- - Add sorting to hrl(8).
-
- - Should priv(9) checking be done by HRL, or by the callers?
-