PERFORCE change 161261 for review
Marko Zec
zec at freebsd.org
Tue Apr 28 18:23:51 UTC 2009
On Tuesday 28 April 2009 19:59:47 Julian Elischer wrote:
> Marko Zec wrote:
> > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=161261
> >
> > Change 161261 by zec at zec_amdx2 on 2009/04/28 17:51:16
> >
> > Unbreak in_rtqtimo().
>
> so, If I'm right,
> the plan is:
>
> commit vimage-commit, with one single vimage
> leave to simmer for a week while people test
> commit vimage-commit2.. in time for BSDCan..
Yup that's the plan, the sooner the better I'd say... The code in
vimage-commit2 is limited to a single vnet instance as well, but the curvnet
there is thread-local, and is being set / cleared where appropriate. So we
will need another commit to add the ability to instantiate multiple vnets and
assign interfaces from one to another, but this would be pretty trivial to
port from the vimage branch, unless we want to hold on the ball and rething
our management interfaces and vnet / jail integration in general, which I
believe we do...
> Oh this is so exciting.. :-)
Well once the bugs start popping out, and people start to discover that many
subsystems are not yet VIMAGE-compliant, it will become exciting indeed :)
Marko
More information about the p4-projects
mailing list