PERFORCE change 129920 for review

[Alfred Perlstein]

* Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky at freebsd.org> [080201 23:18] wrote:
> On Saturday 02 February 2008, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > This change makes very little sense.  If xfer->frbuffers is a bare
> > pointer, then why add 0 to it?  Just pass xfer->frbuffers or use a
> > macro that explains what you are doing.
> >
> 
> I can change those to a plain "xfer->frlengths". It was just a reminder for 
> me, because some places we use "xfer->frlengths + 1" and "xfer->frbuffers + 
> 1".
> 
> I will write a script that converts all of those.

What does '+ 1' mean?  Is it something special like a channel or something?

If so it should be a macro that's more descriptive.

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein