PERFORCE change 154573 for review

[Hans Petter Selasky]

On Saturday 13 December 2008, Warner Losh wrote:
> From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky at c2i.net>
> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 154573 for review
> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:05:32 +0100
>

>
> This is absoultely the wrong way to implement this.  It is so wrong, I
> don't even know where to begin.  Consider this an 'over my dead body'
> level of objection to this design.
>

We don't want to check a variable in the softc every time we do a htoleXX() ??

Do you have a better suggestion?

--HPS