PERFORCE change 120788 for review

[John Baldwin]

On Friday 08 June 2007 02:00:18 pm Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2007/6/8, John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org>:
> > On Wednesday 06 June 2007 09:31:28 am Attilio Rao wrote:
> > > Rui Paulo wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If I'm not doing something wrong, I need to use spin locks on my
> > > > interrupt handler, or else witness_checkorder will complain with
> > > > "blockable sleep lock".
> > > >
> > > > Note that I'm using FILTERs.
> > >
> > > So you are doing this in the wrong way.
> > > In order to use correctly filters, please note that the support for them
> > > is compile time choosen, so you need to wrapper all filter specific
> > > parts using INTR_FILTER compat macro.
> >
> > Actually, if you only use a filter and not an ithread handler, you can do 
that
> > now w/o needing to have any #ifdef INTR_FILTER stuff.
> 
> In the case your kernel doesn't use filters (!INTR_FILTER) and you
> pass a filter, it is automatically mapped to work as a fast handler?

Yes.

-- 
John Baldwin