PERFORCE change 120788 for review

[Attilio Rao]

2007/6/8, John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org>:
> On Wednesday 06 June 2007 09:31:28 am Attilio Rao wrote:
> > Rui Paulo wrote:
> > >
> > > If I'm not doing something wrong, I need to use spin locks on my
> > > interrupt handler, or else witness_checkorder will complain with
> > > "blockable sleep lock".
> > >
> > > Note that I'm using FILTERs.
> >
> > So you are doing this in the wrong way.
> > In order to use correctly filters, please note that the support for them
> > is compile time choosen, so you need to wrapper all filter specific
> > parts using INTR_FILTER compat macro.
>
> Actually, if you only use a filter and not an ithread handler, you can do that
> now w/o needing to have any #ifdef INTR_FILTER stuff.

In the case your kernel doesn't use filters (!INTR_FILTER) and you
pass a filter, it is automatically mapped to work as a fast handler?

Attilio

-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein