PERFORCE change 124529 for review

[Alexander Leidinger]

Quoting Roman Divacky <rdivacky at FreeBSD.org> (from Thu, 2 Aug 2007  
11:30:17 GMT):

> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=124529
>
> Change 124529 by rdivacky at rdivacky_witten on 2007/08/02 11:30:05
>
> 	Implement fake linux_sched_getaffinity() thus fixing java with   
> 2.6.16 and god knows what else.

> ====
>
> @@ -408,7 +408,8 @@
>  240	AUE_NULL	STD	{ int linux_sys_futex(void *uaddr, int op, int val, \
>  					struct l_timespec *timeout, void *uaddr2, int val3); }
>  241	AUE_NULL	UNIMPL	linux_sched_setaffinity
> -242	AUE_NULL	UNIMPL	linux_sched_getaffinity
> +242     AUE_NULL        STD     { int   
> linux_sched_getaffinity(l_pid_t pid, l_uint len, \
> +					l_ulong *user_mask_ptr); }

Whitespace? I can't really tell but it looks like...


> @@ -410,7 +410,8 @@
>  240	AUE_NULL	STD	{ int linux_sys_futex(void *uaddr, int op, int val, \
>  					struct l_timespec *timeout, void *uaddr2, int val3); }
>  241	AUE_NULL	UNIMPL	linux_sched_setaffinity
> -242	AUE_NULL	UNIMPL	linux_sched_getaffinity
> +242	AUE_NULL	STD	{ int linux_sched_getaffinity(l_pid_t pid, l_uint len, \
> +					l_ulong *user_mask_ptr); }

This one looks ok, so the first one is maybe copy&paste.

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
Bender: I believe that qualifies as ill. At least from a technical
  standpoint.

http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137