error building garcon on FreeBSD

[David Lichti]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
I tried to build Xfce on FreeBSD 9.1 using the ports collection and
encountered an several errors when compiling garcon-menu-item-cache.c:
> garcon-menu-item-cache.c: In function
> 'garcon_menu_item_cache_lookup': garcon-menu-item-cache.c:175:
> error: expected ';' before ')' token garcon-menu-item-cache.c:175:
> error: expected statement before ')' token 
> garcon-menu-item-cache.c:187: error: expected ';' before ')' token 
> garcon-menu-item-cache.c:187: error: expected statement before ')'
> token garcon-menu-item-cache.c:205: error: expected ';' before ')'
> token garcon-menu-item-cache.c:205: error: expected statement
> before ')' token garcon-menu-item-cache.c: In function
> 'garcon_menu_item_cache_foreach': garcon-menu-item-cache.c:220:
> error: expected ';' before ')' token garcon-menu-item-cache.c:220:
> error: expected statement before ')' token 
> garcon-menu-item-cache.c:225: error: expected ';' before ')' token 
> garcon-menu-item-cache.c:225: error: expected statement before ')'
> token garcon-menu-item-cache.c: In function
> 'garcon_menu_item_cache_invalidate': garcon-menu-item-cache.c:236:
> error: expected ';' before ')' token garcon-menu-item-cache.c:236:
> error: expected statement before ')' token 
> garcon-menu-item-cache.c:242: error: expected ';' before ')' token 
> garcon-menu-item-cache.c:242: error: expected statement before ')'
> token garcon-menu-item-cache.c: In function
> 'garcon_menu_item_cache_invalidate_file': 
> garcon-menu-item-cache.c:259: error: expected ';' before ')' token 
> garcon-menu-item-cache.c:259: error: expected statement before ')'
> token garcon-menu-item-cache.c:265: error: expected ';' before ')'
> token garcon-menu-item-cache.c:265: error: expected statement
> before ')' token

I was able to complete the compilation by taking comenting out all
lines mentioned above
> _item_cache_lock (cache); _item_cache_unlock (cache);

I dont't know what this funtion should be doing, but probably someone
with more insight should look over these lines.

David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSKyf/AAoJEJmIEsQzdXsq1c8H/R+uGYFfK6uI0n/jo6S3OmCB
y+MaGiqvOH4RB2H5vlu/V9BZoZZp2HYJaAQCfb1S50+xlbj8BBga3hQUv94E+PCg
SNdjm/1JBxB0jdRO4iER30U/Mr4KXsYASvmsKVhU7FZuDJwkavz736/WPl6mXfKA
zgH6RJcM0YYwAV4hNGzxUJSDUY/BsGR7dbTpo0T99IV7Lf3RMuHNEcKiH8gf3+qf
SfeVSdDPluFIxInbZPDi1E2Z76ILUKl/gOgsoFNEaT0INWjYK0aMF3wOza3PbF1N
Tu+fjXrmbP0RpuBs7DRxOw77jm5B74QIYYbFdmsji0pSIddYn+e077Yvr/eIgag=
=Rw4r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----