cvs commit: ports/archivers/squeeze Makefile ports/deskutils/xfce4-tumbler Makefile ports/sysutils/garcon Makefile ports/sysutils/xfce4-settings Makefile ports/x11/libexo Makefile ports/x11/libxfce4menu Makefile ports/x11/libxfce4util Makefile ...

[Doug Barton]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/30/2012 21:38, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 07:17:34PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> While we're working on OPTIONS, did you by any chance take this 
>> opportunity to standardize the order in which the various common
>> options appear? I've noticed several times while installing new
>> systems that various things appear in many of the options menus
>> (like docs, nls, etc.) but always in a different order.
>> 
>> Doug
> 
> With optionsng all the options are always in the same order: 1/ the
> "normal/classic" options sorted 2/ then the "multi" sorted per
> multi 3/ the "single" sorted per single

Hmm. Are you saying that if I put my OPTIONS in order "B C A" that
they will be displayed as "A B C" ?? If so, that's bad, because I
group my options in meaningful chunks, and would not want to see the
infrastructure mess with them.

Doug

- -- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPxvwaAAoJEFzGhvEaGryE+1UH/iGRfZKGajJo3hT/+ASjUO6B
xsNzSiNlGpooW3kXKKEWN0/ogWkHdAhsjH9vq5HWX+2MX5+eOeCuJ8dQjtF1S5Ad
r+cRaVWAzRBSqEOaiHpE5oixR9ASuuXkqZYLJZToG54dOZ8XKkmRu9gaSbq/zZ/p
Of/EI2UtOyvMNh319cc0DXgXXd7q47eBRU0UXmo3i613dtsyRkvinH3eeELE7yOI
rWNdXrKXd27ytrBhdgPc44nbFZs47XCTEPvxDCOqq/87l+CU70ZNxuFAXb4xNGYG
SiQ3RYO3Iq4mnZ4SF897adHCaRX63gEoyDwm8WfltSQ8iWGbKJN0KLW/uVDSQ6A=
=vPUT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----