[Fwd: xfce4-taskmanager-1.0.0_1 failed on amd64 9]

[Cy Schubert]

In message <4EB4EC41.4080003 at freebsd.org>, Rene Ladan writes:
> On 05-11-2011 03:51, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > In message <4EB4709A.9050502 at freebsd.org>, Rene Ladan writes:
> >> On 04-11-2011 23:18, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> >>> -------- Pøeposlaná zpráva --------
> >>>> Od: User Ports-amd64 <ports-amd64 at freebsd.org>
> >>>> Komu: cvs at oook.cz, itetcu at freebsd.org, florent.thoumie at gmail.com
> >>>> Pøedmìt: xfce4-taskmanager-1.0.0_1 failed on amd64 9
> >>>> Datum: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:25:52 GMT
> >>>>
> >>>> You can also find this build log at
> >>>>
> >>>>   http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/a.9.20111103122
> 91
> >> 4/xfce4-taskmanager-1.0.0_1.log
> >>>>
> >> [.. snip log..]
> >>
> >> It builds fine on my tinderbox (7-9 i386-gcc, 10-i386-clang):
> >> http://rene-ladan.nl:8080/tb/index.php?action=describe_port&id=575
> >>
> >> and builds/runs fine on my 9-amd64-clang laptop.
> >> René
> > 
> > I know what the problem is.
> > 
> > #if defined(__FreeBSD_version) && __FreeBSD_version >= 900044
> > 
> > What is __FreeBSD_version on the package build machine? This should be set 
> > to something more reasonable than the latest 9.0. When did MAXLSLP get 
> > moved to sys/vumeter.h>?
> > 
> This must be specific for amd64, because it builds fine in my 10-i386
> tinderbox? (OSVERSION=1000000, like above).

I'll boot my testbed into 9.0 (amd64) or 10.0 (amd64) and try it there. 
(The testbed has a bit of everything on it.)


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at komquats.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy at FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.