drm-next-kmod panic

Nils Beyer nbe at renzel.net
Tue Sep 5 15:11:02 UTC 2017


On 08/31/2017 19:09, Pete Wright wrote:
> if there is no core in /var/crash you can try adding this sysctl knob which may increase the probability of capturing a core for analysis:

Same problem - but I have a crash dump; here's a partial text portion:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address   = 0x20
fault code              = supervisor read data, page not present
instruction pointer     = 0x20:0xffffffff8280ddba
stack pointer           = 0x28:0xfffffe0117fcf7e0
frame pointer           = 0x28:0xfffffe0117fcf840
code segment            = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
                         = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags        = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process         = 0 (linuxkpi_short_wq_2)
trap number             = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 0
time = 1504630325
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0 0xffffffff80abecf7 at kdb_backtrace+0x67
#1 0xffffffff80a7b0bc at vpanic+0x19c
#2 0xffffffff80a7af13 at panic+0x43
#3 0xffffffff80efc18d at trap_fatal+0x34d
#4 0xffffffff80efc1e9 at trap_pfault+0x49
#5 0xffffffff80efba39 at trap+0x2a9
#6 0xffffffff80edf0d1 at calltrap+0x8
#7 0xffffffff8291cc44 at intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x14
#8 0xffffffff82870957 at async_run_entry_fn+0x27
#9 0xffffffff828641a0 at linux_work_fn+0xe0
#10 0xffffffff80ad0667 at taskqueue_run_locked+0x147
#11 0xffffffff80ad1848 at taskqueue_thread_loop+0xb8
#12 0xffffffff80a3e4b5 at fork_exit+0x85
#13 0xffffffff80edf6be at fork_trampoline+0xe
Uptime: 6s
Dumping 314 out of 3929 MB:..6%..11%..21%..31%..41%..51%..62%..72%..82%..92%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shall I open a bug report?



BR,
Nils


More information about the freebsd-x11 mailing list